The Role of Faith in a Science PhD

I attended my long-awaited PhD commencement a few months ago. It was a virtual ceremony of course, given the pandemic – but it was a proud and triumphant moment nevertheless. It was the fulfillment of a lifelong dream. Ever since I was 4 and walked into my dad’s super cool lab, I wanted to become a scientist, wear giant goggles, and add that “Dr” in front of my name.

In my dad’s lab, circa 1994.

In fact, one of the very first books I ever wrote at the age of 5 was titled “Doctor Pooja”, complete with a Clifford the dog sticker. The contents don’t quite make for a compelling story, but it’s something I have always thought I would become. I never really questioned the dream, it was always the path I was going to follow.

The reason I did a STEM PhD is because I have spent my whole life truly believing in science. I grew up in a land where luck, superstition, and religion prevail, however I have considered myself above the fray – I will not blindly believe things I cannot see the evidence for. Why should I be wary of black cats who cross my path? Why shouldn’t I cut my nails on a Thursday or Saturday or whichever day is considered inauspicious? Why exactly do I need to eat white food before a big exam? I have never considered myself a particularly religious person, nor do I quite care for societal and cultural norms. I do not think they make sense in the current day and age – even if by some chance, they made sense in the day and age they came to be. I need a reason to believe in something, and it needs to be a convincing reason. I like questioning, I like analyzing, and any worship I did was at the altar of science. So yes, I proudly call myself a woman of science, a follower of logic, and in battles of the head vs heart, I like to think that my ultimate decisions are the ones that make sense. I have followed this path from my nerdy parents’ home in a scientific colony to a premier institute for science in India, all the way to a well-respected graduate program in New York City, where I finally earned my doctoral degree, confirming to myself and everyone else that I am indeed a scientist through and through.

And yet, one of the primary ways I got through my science PhD was by learning faith. Along with all the scientific techniques, the methodology, the endless assays, critical reasoning and analysis I learnt- in parallel to all that I had to pick up a good ol’ dose of faith along the way. Faith, which I had dismissed and scorned for the first 25 years of my life. Because like I said, I am the person who believes in concrete evidence, in irrefutable data. And all my life, I had enjoyed science. I did well in science at school. And the evidence for this was that I always scored well. My marks would not lie, would they? Neither would my teachers, my superiors, the people I looked up to. All the evidence pointed to the fact that I was and would be great at research. A science PhD was my calling, and I would barrel towards it.

Fast-forward to two years into my PhD: my driving force had collapsed upon itself. I was struggling to juggle multiple projects. I was floundering. None of my results were promising or convincing – they weren’t a definitive yes or no answer to my hypotheses, they were all a ‘try again later’. They were inconclusive and frustrating, and with each experiment that failed, I felt like I had failed. There was no evidence that my projects were working, and no evidence that I was suitable for grad school. In addition, I would routinely be told that all the failed experiments were because I wasn’t smart enough, focused enough, sincere enough. Every time I didn’t get the expected result, I was told that I must have done something wrong. I didn’t feel supported, I didn’t feel encouraged – instead, I was doubted, time and again, and I took it personally. I started doubting myself and my capabilities. I felt like I was flailing, thrashing about to stay afloat and yet still drowning. And the world, my world kept getting darker and darker. Every experiment, every lab meeting just made it worse. I couldn’t see a way through. It felt like I was all alone, struggling and failing, and instead of helping me up, the person who was supposed to help was kicking me while I was down. Meanwhile, everyone else around me appeared to be doing just fine. And so I stopped reaching out to people – family and friends and colleagues who could have helped – I didn’t want to let them see the full extent of the failure I felt, because, well, what if they agreed? What if they thought of me as a failure too? I couldn’t face that. And so I shrunk some more, curled up upon myself, hid my tears and panic attacks – and tried to hide away from the horrifying thought that maybe I was completely failing at the one thing, the only thing I had ever wanted to do. The only thing I wanted in life. This was my dream, this was it. There was no Plan B. And now, it looked like I wasn’t strong enough, smart enough, capable enough of achieving my dream. And that fear, that sheer terror of not being enough took over my life. It took over every thought, every action. I spent months, years, on the verge of tears. I burst into tears so often, that I quickly had to come up with a tried-and-tested three tier-system for places to cry in secret, based on the intensity of emotion, and how much time I could afford before I needed to suck it up and get back to work. My sleep patterns were completely wrecked – I lay awake at all hours of night just silently panicking about the results I still didn’t have, the experiments I needed to redesign. On the occasions I did manage to fall asleep, I would wake up with my heart thumping in my chest, feeling a crushing weight pinning me into my bed and I couldn’t sit up. I felt exhausted and broken down, and every single day, it was the same fight over and over. There was no light to be seen at the end of this tunnel.

I lost my driving force, you see. My belief system, in myself and my abilities had crumbled. My belief in academia had collapsed. I turned to gallows humor and escapism, joked about quarter-life crises, and spent every non-working moment immersed in fictional worlds. If I read fantasy novels non-stop till bedtime, if I binge-watched Friends over and over, perhaps it would turn off the part of my brain that was obsessing over my failures. For two whole years, I couldn’t fall asleep unless I had the TV on in the background. My head was not a safe space, my thoughts were not kind.

I had three options at this point – (1) quit my PhD, (2) switch to a different lab and hope things would be better, and (3) stick it through. I ruled out option 2 pretty quickly, because after a certain time, switching to a different lab would only restart my PhD timeline and add even more years to grad school. That was unacceptable. I thought of quitting – oh, how I thought of it. I was miserable and drowning and saw no way out. I was in my third, fourth, and then fifth year and was nowhere close to a solid project or a publication. I had no data to present at departmental retreats, no posters, no talks. As someone who was used to performing well, had defined herself by performing well, this was pretty unbearable. The only reason I didn’t quit was because I just couldn’t live with myself if I did that. I am not a quitter. I couldn’t live with myself if I quit my PhD, if I admitted that I couldn’t handle it and walked away. This would involve leaving the country. Leaving my dream. Starting over. Lost years. And so even if it killed me, I would not quit.

And so I stuck it out. I stayed. There wasn’t any one defining moment when I made this choice – I had to choose this option, time and again. It was a long painful process. I slowly started opening up to people about how I felt. I started realizing that I wasn’t alone, that there were people who felt like me. Smart people, talented people whom I looked up to, who were also struggling. The impostor syndrome was very real and isolating. I started letting people in to see my ‘failed’ vulnerable self. I opened up to my friends about it, let them see the messy reality of who I was at that moment. I asked for help. I grew less worried about how I would be perceived – frankly because after a point, keeping up a façade was more effort than it was worth. I relied on my family, I relied on my friends. No, the project did not change overnight. The constant stream of soul-crushing feedback I had to deal with didn’t change either. But I stopped hiding and tried to fight the shame. I swallowed my reservations and went to therapy. I reached out to people around me, to people in charge. I had to teach myself that ‘being sensitive’ was not a weakness. I am fond of logic and efficiency, yes, but I will never be an unemotional robot. I will always have feelings, big full-blown messy feelings – and that’s okay. I slowly learnt to accept all my emotions, to know that how I was feeling was not inherently wrong or right, it was just the way it was. I started advocating for myself, for my thought process and experiments, instead of immediately assuming I must have screwed up.

And somewhere along the way, I ended up building myself a new belief system. One that still enjoyed external validation, but did not require it. One where I actively worked on having faith in myself and my abilities, faith from within. And a little bit of faith in the universe. Faith that somehow things will eventually work out. And faith that while I can’t control everything, even if events and circumstances might be out of my control, I have the ability to handle it. That all I can do is control the factors I can, do the best with what information I have at any given moment, and then leave the rest to the universe. And believe that it will work out, one way or another, at some point in time. Perhaps in a way I couldn’t predict. I still wouldn’t call myself religious, but I did built up my own set of beliefs. Of blind faith, even when there’s no immediate evidence in front of me.

And slowly, things changed. I ended up finding a whole new angle to my project. It became a bigger and well-rounded story, and I could finally publish it. I could give talks, construct my own narrative around the data, and how I interpreted it. This was literally in my final months as a grad student, but I managed it. I convinced my committee to let me defend. And I enjoyed giving my defense talk. I realized over time that the process I truly enjoyed was not the day-to-day bench work, but creating narratives out of data, putting together the puzzle pieces to uncover the underlying picture. Surprise surprise! Storytelling has always been my thing. I just never thought I could make a career out of it.

Doctor Pooja at last!

So here I am, finally. Faith got me through my science PhD. It got me on a much different career path from what I had envisioned. It got me to a place where I get to indulge in my creativity, as well as think about science and data and how to help people. Faith got me to an unexpected place that has been a joy and revelation. It might someday lead me down other paths I haven’t planned on. But maybe I’m okay with not having my whole life planned out anymore. Maybe I don’t have to follow a trajectory I set in motion twenty five years ago. I know there are probably lots of surprises in store for me, of the pleasant and nasty variety – and there’s no way of knowing what will happen – but what I do know now is that I am capable, I am strong, and I will figure it out.

Error: Printer Not Connected

Error messages blink left and right,

Printer not connected, printer is offline!

Paper problems of every kind:

Prints of faded colors, text too light,

Unwanted spots and horizontal lines!

20170920_233010

 

Have you ever met a printer

That isn’t very temperamental?

All that it’s required to do

Is print out a copy or two!

But of course it isn’t that straightforward

Printers don’t just obey orders.

 

Error messages blink left and right,

Printer not connected, printer is offline!

Paper problems of every kind:

Prints of faded colors, text too light,

Unwanted spots and horizontal lines!

Then of course we have the dreaded Paper Jam:

Misfed sheets, mysteriously crooked,

Hard to remove, they’re clamped tightly in its jaws,

The printer shall not relinquish!

As for paper sizes – A4 or 3?

Who’s dealing with that? Not me!

If the paper’s fine, go check the ink,

Dried-up cartridges make me flinch.

But the most frustrating issue ever

Is even when you’re assured of ink and paper,

Print jobs neatly lined up in a queue,

No error messages whatsoever.

All looks perfect, but for some unknown reason

The printer refuses to print altogether!

You curse and you kick,

You sigh and roll your eyes,

But Mr. Inkjet here remains blithely oblivious

To all expressions of exasperation!

 

After all those logical fixes,

Troubleshooting manuals and forums galore,

Here is my (very scientific!) assessment:

Logic can only go so far –

The missing ingredient is human touch!

So hand out a gentle pat or two,

A loving caress, an encouraging word,

Praises, compliments, they’re all very welcome.

See, printers are just like the rest of us:

All they need is love!

So next time, instead of irritation,

Take a deep breath, be kind and patient.

Printer tantrums are best dealt

With firm and loving attention.

Don’t take it for granted,

Don’t ignore it till you need it.

Forge a bond, build a relationship.

As long as you Stay Connected

Your printer will too!

Till graduation do us part!

Over the course of my first year as a grad student, I realized that selecting a PhD lab and a Principal Investigator (PI) to work with is analogous to choosing your life partner, only in fast-forward: you’re supposed to do it in the span of one year, and you’re given merely three chances to get it right.

The first thing grad school introduces us to is the concept of lab rotations. To begin with, you are presented with a large pool of PIs who are interested in getting new students. They will give fancy presentations about the incredibly cool work happening in their labs – they will be pleasant and approachable, and you will be blown away by the sheer talent as well as overwhelmed by the number of options you have.

Next, you will narrow down this pool of contestants using whatever criteria suits you best. Some students will go for labs which have similar interests; something related to what they have worked on before, something which is their ‘type’. Others will choose labs which work on topics completely unrelated to what they’ve been doing for so long. They want to explore new avenues and vistas, try out something novel and see if they like it if they just gave it a chance.

Once you have shortlisted a few PIs, you send them an email indicating your interest. You hope they respond favorably, in which case both parties set up a meeting. This, ladies and gentlemen, is the first date! The PI and the grad student will both be on their best behavior. They will be chatty and interested. The student will try to impress the PI by his past achievements and accolades. They will discuss past experiences, and how that has made them the person they are today. They will animatedly share thoughts and ideas about what they want from this new relationship, and come to a mutual consensus. Eventually, the PI will welcome you into his/her life and lab, albeit on a trial basis. Voilà, you’re dating.

As a rotation student, you will get to know each other much better. While both parties are still positive and happy, this is also the time you figure out exactly what is expected from you. You realize what your individual work styles are, and if they are harmonious or jarringly out of tune. The little quirks which seemed endearingly human on the first date will appear in their full glory. You will either take them in your stride, or discover that they actually drive you crazy – and might even be a deal-breaker. Some relationships thrive in these three months, while others, not so much. Both the PI and the student are assessing each other and making a mental pros and cons list about whether they are a good fit or not.

At the end of the trial period, the student describes everything he learnt being in the lab. The PI evaluates the student’s performance as a lab member, and eventually they sit down and have a heart-to-heart about their feelings and if they have changed in any way after the trial period. They figure out if one or both parties are still interested in making this arrangement more permanent. They usually can’t commit to each other at this stage – it is understood that the student will be seeing other PIs, and the PI will entertain other students if they come along. However, if the rotation has been a happy one, there will be a verbal agreement about keeping each other in mind at the end of the year when they are both ready to commit.

After three such rotations over the course of the first year, (or more – you do have the option of an extra rotation if you aren’t satisfied and feel that there are plenty more fish in the sea for you) the student will decide which lab he liked the most, and wants to be a part of for the foreseeable future. He will go back to his top choice and ask the PI if they can take their relationship to the next level: in sickness and in health, till graduation do us part. If the PI reciprocates these feelings, then the deal is sealed. The student has to regretfully inform his other two choices that it just didn’t work out, they are very different, and it’s better if they remain just colleagues. And so finally, after long last, the student and the PI can live happily ever after!

(Expect a sequel to this story at some point – we’ll see how happy the ever after really is.)